« Six Year Old Autistic Boy Prosecuted for Assault?Clear Evidence of Vaccines? Could It Be? ACK! »

9 comments

Comment from: John Best [Visitor] Email · http://hatingautism.blogspot.com
Thomas,
K Leitch will say whatever he can come up with to put down parents who have cured their kids or are in the process of curing them. He is probably afraid to answer you here because he doesn't control the site and can not delete the beating he would take in an open forum.
I think if you met some of the kids who have gone from severely autistic to a higher state of existence via chelation, you would change your mind about vaccines as the cause.
I worked in an institution with teenagers who were just like my son. He has improved tremendously while these poor kids never will because the people who run the institution won't listen to anyone who is using new treatments. Neurodiversity is doing their best to prevent these kids from having a chance to live outside of those institutions. Their alleged support of autistic people is just part of their sham as they convince young kids to accept a disability rather than helping themselves with new treatments that are working.
10/09/07 @ 15:07
Comment from: Thomas [Member] Email · http://www.thomasamckean.com
To John Best...

I have never responded to a comment before, but I make an exception in this case...

I have seen some bad things come from the ND crowd. But K Leitch *did* just submit in writing over on Autism Speaks that he was willing to cure his daughter.

I am not sure how much credit we should give to that, but he does deserve at least some for it. I, for one, was happy to see it posted there because by saying that, he in effect went against everything the ND stand for.

I thought it was a very brave thing for him to do.
10/09/07 @ 15:33
Comment from: Toni [Visitor] Email
Thomas,
If this post were a speech, and I were sitting listening, I'd have been on my feet cheering about a third of the way through. Hear, hear! Thank you so much for saying so eloquently what so many parents feel.
You are absolutely awesome, and I thank you so much for being able to see through OUR eyes as well!



10/09/07 @ 18:47
Comment from: Anne [Visitor] Email
Thomas, for the record, the statement of yours that I object
to is quoted below. I object to your proposal that, at autism
conferences, speakers who claim to be autistic must show their
"documentation" and be vetted based on age of diagnosis and
educational history. I don't know who, specifically, your
message is or was aimed at, but I don't think that autistic
speakers should be required to reveal legally confidential
information that nobody else has to reveal. Surely you wouldn't
propose that all parent speakers be required to provide
documentation of their child's diagnosis, preferably at an early
age, and their child's educational history. In my opinion it
isn't appropriate to require that in the context of autism
conferences. That's the basis of my objection.

The following is from "A Danger in Speaking" by Thomas A. McKean:

If you are claiming to have autism, let’s see some proof.
I have proof and I am willing to show it to anyone who wants
to see it before I speak at a conference.

And even with the proof, there are other things to consider.
Where are they coming from? What was the early education like?
What kind of experiences did they have when they were younger?

Another very important question to ask is what age they were
diagnosed. More than one speaker currently on the circuit is
“self diagnosed.” This is extremely dangerous and they should
not be allowed to speak until they have documentation proving
a valid diagnosis by a reputable doctor. Those with a late
diagnosis are suspect as far as I am concerned ... .
10/10/07 @ 17:16
Comment from: Jon Mitchell [Visitor] Email · http://www.jonathans-stories.com
Bravo, Tom, great post, I am a person with autism who
wants a cure and resents neurodiversity movement trying
to speak for me. I suspect that at least some of those
people who say they don't want a cure would be at the
front of the line to get one if there was one.

Could not agree more.
10/10/07 @ 23:16
Comment from: Thomas [Member] Email · http://www.thomasamckean.com
To Anne:

You are correct that having to show confidential medical documentation is absolutely ridiculous. Of course it is. If you have a better idea, I would sure love to hear it.

We simply cannot have any willy nilly person off the street telling the audience they have autism when the only reason they have it is simply because they said so. Any idiot can walk off the street and say that. This opens the door to some incredible damage for the parents and the educators and others in the audience who are listening. (And you can be damn sure they are listening!!!)

The only way we have to learn what autism is currently is to hear it from those who can talk about it. I am not too happy about this because I have lost a lot of privacy over it. But at the same time, I know I have done good work.

Hell, Anne, even you know I have done good work.

There absolutely must be accountability. If you have another way to create said accountability, I am all ears.

This would not even be necessary if those "self diagnosed" people did not have the desire to be autistic, something that I will never understand.

Not only that, but a lot of the "self diagnosed" are neurodiverse extremists who only want to take the stage so they can hurt the parents who are only trying to give the children they love a higher quality of life.

It disappoints me that you, or anyone, could support that.
10/10/07 @ 23:30
Comment from: Joeker [Visitor] Email
Your blog is fantastic. I am so relieved to find a blogger like you. I look forward to reading your blog. I understand your viewpoint completely, and all I can say is "Yes."

In all seriousness, you're an inspiration.

Thanks.
10/18/07 @ 05:32
Comment from: T.D. [Visitor] Email
Great post, Thomas! Thank you.
12/03/07 @ 18:27
Comment from: jack [Visitor] Email
in the fourth grade i had the tested ability to read comprehend and retain the things i read at a fourth year college level . i had no friends to speak of then or for many years afterwards , was socially stunted if you will . i learned tricks down the road on how to interact and entertain i an almost clinical manner , going throught the motions of what peole expect or want . i usppose the moral is that alhtough it may have had a set back or two it never really made me sad as a child i wouldn`t trade my gifts from this in any capacity even if it means losing the curses as well , it`s part of what defines me .

(i concede for those trapped within themselves and the like that a cure would be great , but not for all , i feel as though i have benefited from my "illness")
09/11/08 @ 20:02

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)